Study: No Boeing 757 Hit Pentagon

Pilots for 9/11 Truth obtained black box data from the government under the Freedom of Information Act for AA Flight 77, which The 9/11 Report claims hit the Pentagon. Analysis of the data contradicts the official account in direction, approach, and altitude. The plane was too high to hit lamp posts and would have flown over the Pentagon, not impacted with its ground floor. This result confirms and strengthens the previous findings of Scholars for 9/11 Truth that no Boeing 757 hit the building.

According to James H. Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth:

• The hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands 44 feet above the ground; the kind and quantity of debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: there were no wings, no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Not even the engines were recovered, and they are practically indestructible.

• Of an estimate 84 videotapes of the crash, the three that have been released by the Pentagon do not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as even Bill O’Reilly admitted when one was shown on “The Factor”. At 155 feet, the plane was more than twice as long as the 77-foot Pentagon is high and should have been visible. There are indications of a much smaller plane, but not a Boeing 757.

• Indeed, the aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory–flying more than 500 mph barely above ground level–physically impossible, because of the accumulation of a massive pocket of compressed gas (air) beneath the fuselage; and if it had come it at an angle instead, it would have created a massive crater; but there is no crater and the official trajectory is impossible.

• Flying low enough to impact with the ground floor would have meant that the enormous engines were plowing the ground and creating massive furrows; but there are no massive furrows. The smooth, unblemished surface of the Pentagon lawn thus stands as a “smoking gun” proving the official trajectory cannot be sustained.

Fetzer says, “The Pentagon has become a kind of litmus test for rationality in the study of 9/11. Those who persist in maintaining that a Boeing 757 hit the building are either unfamiliar with the evidence or cognitively impaired. Unless they want to mislead the American people. The evidence is beyond clear and compelling. It places this issue ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’. No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon.”

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Study: No Boeing 757 Hit Pentagon

  1. DCVET says:

    I live in DC and I have relatives who live in northern Virginia. They pass by the Pentagon complex each day on their way to work. None of them reported seeing or hearing a jumbo jet skimming along at ground level the morning of 9/11. They heard an explosion — what they described as a bomb, but no one saw a jumbo jet flying 100 feet above the ground.

  2. Harry says:

    It’s just like the JFK assassination. The truth won’t be known for 100 years.

  3. truthseeker says:

    …the aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory–flying more than 500 mph barely above ground level–physically impossible..

    Not to mention the piloting skills required to control a plane of that size flying at tree-tops level is greater than that of the men who allegedly took 100 hours of flight training in a Cessna 150 in Florida.

    Thanks for posting this.

  4. TOM339 says:

    It’s just like the chapter of Building 7 at the WTC.

    Firefighters heard explosions going off inside the building. Building 7 wasn’t struck by commercial aircraft and it didn’t burn, yet hours after the Twin Towers fell, explosion after explosion was reported by the NYFD in a building a block away and with no visible fire, it fell in on itself.

    I guess the question becomes: do you believe the government or the firefighters? After the lies about WMD in Iraq, you can damn well bet who I believe.

  5. JollyRoger says:

    I’m not sure if they lied to cover up culpability, or lied to cover up just how stupid they really are. But there are a whole lot of things that just do not wash.

  6. feminazi says:

    The film the government released allegedly from parking lot cameras show the edge of the building, followed by a silver object skimming along the ground that looks more like a UFO than an airplane and then the explosion. What struck me as strange was the silver object looks like a pencil – it’s smooth from end to end. Don’t airplanes have tails?

  7. Brigadoon says:

    This is fascinating stuff, Christopher. These are scientists and professionals making these claims and not arm chair sceptics and cynics. It certainly took long enough to hear from these guys but better late than never I suppose.

  8. taco says:

    Pilots are usually as good a witness in a court case as you can find.

    If a pilot says there’s something fishy about the claim of a 757 flying into the Pentagon, then it’s good enough for me. Jeez, has this administration told the truth about anything?

  9. Uber Highwayman says:

    “Yawn”

    So what else is new, guys? 😉

    Great post, Chris! The truth is coming out!

  10. kayinmaine says:

    Only a missile could do what that “plane” did that day, Christopher! There is no way that an unskilled pilot (“hijacker” that morning apparently LOL) could bring that plane in at ground level and hit the first floor only feet from the ground. No way! Only a guided missile could do that.

    So, where are the people on the plane? Well, I think they were flown to a government destination and still to this day think they’re being held hostage by the hijackers. Hell, they could be out of the country for all we know!

    Just some thoughts on it…

  11. Pam says:

    Unless they want to mislead the American people.

    There’s your bit of truth, right there.

  12. Jim says:

    Is this, then, akin to that “magic bullet” from the Kennedy assassination?

  13. TomCat says:

    On the other hand, I have heard accounts from the pentagon of removing corpses still in airliner seats. It’s hard to know what to believe, and the so-called 911 truth movement has made it more difficult, by becoming the left wing equivalent of the religious right. There is one thing of which I have no doubt. A subsidiary if the Carlyle group, a company in which both the Bushes and Bin Ladens are heavily invested, made millions through record short sales of the two companies most severely impacted in the week leading up to the tragedy. At the very least, Bush knew and allowed it to happen to enable the Pearl Harbor PNAC hoped for to implement the neocon War on Freedom.

Leave a comment