NOM’s Maggie Gallagher Stops Eating Long Enough to Bash Judge’s Decision Striking Down DOMA

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Maggie Gallagher, chairman of the National Organization for Marriage, stopped eating long enough to release this bizarre statement in response to a Federal judge in Boston ruling the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional:

“Does this Federal judge want to start another culture war Does he really want another Roe. v. Wade? The simple fact is that the right of the Federal government to define marriage for the purposes of its Federal law and Federal territories has been clear since the late 19th century, when Congress banned polygamy. Only an incompetent defense could have lost this case. We expect to win in a higher court.”

And herein lies Gallagher’s greatest fear.

Once the the U.S. Supreme Court upholds the Boston decision that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional and a violation of the spirit of the Founding Fathers declaration that “all men are created equal” and have inalienable rights to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” and which must include the right of same-sex couples to enter into marriage, her entire construct of gender roles will fall away.

This entry was posted in DOMA, Gay Marriage, LGBT, Maggie Gallagher, News and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to NOM’s Maggie Gallagher Stops Eating Long Enough to Bash Judge’s Decision Striking Down DOMA

  1. Chad Lebanon says:

    Why can’t Maggie choke on a ham sandwich and say hello to Mama Cass Elliot?

  2. Kate Novotny says:

    Such a pathological dislike of gay men suggests way back in her history, in high school or maybe college, Gallagher fall hard for a gay man, and he was having none of her.

    It’s the only explanation that makes any sense.

  3. Randy Arroyo says:

    Margaret de Hog Lady!

  4. feminazi says:

    Why is it people who oppose rights for gay couples to marry must always introduce polygamy into their objection? It makes them look and sound ignorant and foolish.

  5. Brigadoon says:

    You think Maggie might hate ‘teh gays’ less if we stuff her ugly face with 20lbs. of fried chicken and waffles? Nah, her ugly is in her bones. Even if she rammed her mouth in a commercial chocolate bar machine she would come up a hatin’,

  6. Joe says:

    Maggie the Hut:
    hungry maggie

  7. TomDem says:

    I don’t know why these folks hate their fellow citizens, It’s not like the bible tells them to hate
    and they ALL know their bible…
    Maybe it’s just blind hatred…yea that’s the ticket

    still… I don’t get the whole marriage thing…how does somebody’s marriage impact on anothers?

    Why do red states have higher divorce rates than BLUE ones…

  8. veseslree says:

    If you had anything to say, you would actually look at her arguments. Attacks on a person’s appearance are a sign that your argument is lacking something. It is beneath you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s