Books I Like

These books are available through your local, national, or internet book retailer. From the Left receives no financial support for suggesting these books.

___________________________________________________________________ 

WORSE THAN WATERGATE by John W. Dean

The most facile presidential comparison one could make for George W. Bush would be his father, who presided over a war in Iraq and a struggling economy. Some “neocons” reject the parallel and compare Bush to his father’s predecessor, Ronald Reagan, citing a plainspoken quality and a belief in deep tax cuts. But John Dean goes further back, seeing in Bush all the secrecy and scandal of Dean’s former boss, the notorious Richard Nixon. The difference, as the title of Dean’s book indicates, is that Bush is a heck of a lot worse. While the book provides insightful snippets of the way Nixon used to do business, it offers them to shed light on the practices of Bush. In Dean’s estimation, the secrecy with which Bush and Dick Cheney govern is not merely a preferred system of management but an obsessive strategy meant to conceal a deeply troubling agenda of corporate favoritism and a dramatic growth in unchecked power for the executive branch that put at risk the lives of American citizens, civil liberties, and the Constitution. Dean sets out to make his point by drawing attention to several areas about which Bush and Cheney have been tight-lipped: the revealing by a “senior White House official” of the identity of an undercover CIA operative whose husband questioned the administration, the health of Cheney, the identity of Cheney’s energy task force, the information requested by the bi-partisan 9/11 commission, Bush’s business dealings early in his career, the creation of a “shadow government”, wartime prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay, and scores more. He theorizes that the truth about these and many other situations, including the decision to go to war in Iraq, will eventually surface and that Bush and Cheney’s secrecy is a thus far effective means of keep a lid on a rapidly multiplying set of lies and scandals that far outstrip the misdeeds that led directly to Dean’s former employer resigning in disgrace. Dean’s charges are impassioned and more severe than many of Bush’s most persistent critics. But those charges are realized only after careful reasoning and steady logic by a man who knows his way around scandal and corruption. –John Moe ______________________________________________________________________

AMERICAN DYNASTY by Kevin Phillips

Paraphrasing a passage from Machiavelli’s The Prince, Kevin Phillips writes, “a ruler can ignore the mob and devote himself to the interests of the ruling class, gulling the inert majority who constitute the ruled.” He then says, “Borgia references aside, 21st-century American readers of The Prince may feel that they have stumbled on a thinly disguised Bush White House political memo.” These pointed words would sting regardless of who uttered them, but coming from Phillips, a former Republican strategist, they have an added piquancy. In American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush, Phillips traces the rise of the Bush family from investment banking elites to political power brokers, using their Ivy League network, vast wealth, and questionable political maneuvering to obtain the White House and consequently, shake the foundation of constitutional American democracy. Citing the Bush family mainstays of finance, energy (oil), the military industrial complex, and national security and intelligence (the CIA), Phillips uses copious examples to show the dangerous alliance between the Bushes’ business interests (huge corporations such as Enron and Haliburton) and the formation of national policy. No other family, Phillips says, that has fulfilled its presidential aspirations has been so involved in the ascendancy of the arms industry and of the 21st-century American imperium–often at the expense of regional and world peace and for their personal gain. It is hard to tell what offends Phillips the most: the Bushes’ systematic deceit and secrecy, their shady business dealings, their cronyism, or their family philosophy that privileges the very wealthy and utterly dismisses all the rest. It is clearly all of these things combined. But at the top of Phillips’ list is the dynastic nature of their family power, for it is that concentration of power and influence that strikes at the heart of our democracy. Past administrations have transgressed, albeit not so egregiously, and other political families have had dynastic ambitions. But none have succeeded as thoroughly as the Bushes. Jefferson and Madison would be horrified, and according to Phillips, we should be too. –Silvana Trope ______________________________________________________________________

FRAUD: THE BUSH LIES and WHY THE MEDIA DIDN’T TELL YOU by Paul Waldman

Building on tenets laid out in The Press Effect, which he coauthored with Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Waldman deconstructs Bush’s image as plainspoken, compassionate Dubya and accuses the media of failing to properly scrutinize the values of his presidency. Bush’s inarticulateness misleads a gullible public into perceiving the president as a “real,” ordinary American, Waldman argues, contending that Bush’s administration actually serves a business elite rather than the average American. Meticulously combing through footnoted sources, Waldman carves an alternative portrait of a privileged and ruthless Bush who was gleeful over executions as Texas’s governor, guilty of Enron-style business practices and contemptuous of the protective role of government. American journalists, in Waldman’s view, are either muzzled or lack the policy expertise and research strengths to expose Bush effectively; as a result, the public is woefully confused. Waldman goes on to demythologize the so-called liberal bias of the media, comparing journalists’ past persecution of Clinton with the relative mildness of present-day critiques of Bush. In his breakdown of Bush’s tax policies and of the Republican Party’s dominance by ultraconservative Southerners, Waldman is particularly strident. An assembly of sources and facts and a useful guide to right-wing rhetoric makes this handbook of anti-Bush ammunition-complete with an appendix that provides a “Guide to Key Lies and Misdirections-useful to partisans along with other Bush critiques by David Corn, Eric Alterman and Mark Green. _______________________________________________________________________

GAY MARRIAGE: WHY IT IS GOOD FOR AMERICA by Jonathan Rauch

Marriage, when it’s right (and usually when it’s wrong), is a subject that stirs strong feelings. Gay marriage inspires its own set of passions, with opponents decrying it as a step that will undermine the very fabric of society while supporters posit it as an inevitable next stage in step-by-step acceptance of homosexuality by mainstream America. Appearing as the issue heats ups following President George W. Bush’s call for a constitutional amendment that would block the gathering tide of gay nuptials, this polemic by Atlantic Monthly/National Journal writer Jonathan Rauch deftly walks a fine line, both personalizing the subject (Rauch is a gay man with a longtime lover and a lifelong wistful attitude about marriage) and addressing it with an intellectual poise informed by historical and philosophical perspectives. Rauch actually supports the steady-as-she-goes, state-by-state advancement of gay marriage, believing that “same sex marriage will work best when people accept and understand it, whereas a sudden national enactment, where it suddenly to happen, might spark a culture war on the order of the abortion battle.” Might? It says a lot about Rauch’s temperance that he doesn’t forecast an inevitably fractious future for the nation while it sorts through the implications of gay weddings. There are more impassioned perspectives on the issue, but Rauch’s positive approach advances the issue with a welcome coolheadedness that actually suits the controversy. This is, after all, a fight over the right of traditional outsiders to engage in an inherently conservative institution. –Steven Stolder _______________________________________________________________________

STATE OF WAR by James Risen

The winter holidays are usually a quiet time for news, but the December 2005 revelations of the Bush administration’s extensive, off-the-books domestic spying program by New York Times reporters James Risen and Eric Lichtblau made headline after headline, raising criticism from both sides of the aisle and an immediate, unapologetic response from President Bush himself. On the heels of those scoops comes Risen’s State of War, which goes beyond his Times stories to provide a wide-ranging, if anecdotal, “secret history” of U.S. intelligence following 9/11. Risen’s description of what he says was called “the Program”–the ongoing eavesdropping operation, done with almost no judicial or congressional oversight, on the phone calls and emails of hundreds of Americans (and potentially millions more)–is only a chapter in his larger tale of the recent missteps and oversteps of U.S. intelligence. His evidence ranges from insider White House accounts of Donald Rumsfeld, “the ultimate turf warrior,” outmaneuvering his rivals to make the Defense Department the dominant voice in foreign policy, to on-the-ground reports of the administration’s willful ignorance of crucial intelligence on the dormancy of Saddam’s weapons programs, Saudi support for al Qaeda, and the startlingly rapid transformation of Afghanistan into a “narco-state” under American authority. Some of the episodes he recounts–Saudi security officials with Osama bin Laden screensavers, an Iraqi scientist who had told the CIA his country had no nuclear program watching Colin Powell testify to the UN that they did–would be comical were the stakes less high. Risen’s loyalties are not with the opposition party–he’s sharply critical of Clinton’s disinterest in the CIA–but with the career field agents who are his best sources. Those agents and their expertise, he argues, have been cast aside, along with the long centrist tradition of U.S. foreign policy and the basic checks and balances of the American system of government, by the Bush administration’s radical politicization and militarization of intelligence. He covers a lot of ground in a book of just over 200 pages, some of it familiar from other accounts, and at times his tradecraft anecdotes can be hard to assess without context. But his specific revelations and his well-sourced, angry overview of the way the battles against terror have been fought make for startling, newsmaking reading. –Tom Nissley ______________________________________________________________________

Foxes in the Henhouse : How the Republicans Stole the South and the Heartland and What the Democrats Must Do to Run ‘em Out.  by Steve Jarding and David Saunders

Those who stayed up late to watch with worry or woke in dismay after the November 2004 presidential elections will welcome this answer to “How in the Hell did this happen?” as the first chapter, aptly titled, promises to explain. In this humorous discussion of what went wrong and how to change it, Harvard professor Jarding and Virginia politico Saunders present a method to secure a Democratic victory by gaining the lead in the South and the Midwest. The book encourages Democrats to open their minds to the rural culture of “Bubbas,” or blue collar, religious folks who despise government intrusion, have been voting Republican and would respond to political “NASCAR marketing.” Jarding and Saunders keep it lively, interspersing low-blow jabs at Republicans with statistics, political history and strategies for Democrats to connect with Bubbas over contentious issues like gun control, environmental protection, gay marriage and abortion. Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. _______________________________________________________________________

AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH by Al Gore

At this point it’s absurd that there is still debate over global warming (ie, the current manifestation of climate change). But for those behind the curve, this book is an essential introduction. For those who don’t read, go see the movie this summer. Gore has condensed the information in an accessible way, and though there may be certain details that are not prudently presented, the overall picture is an accurate summary of the climate science consensus. I suppose there are right-wing Fox-heads who will go to their graves convinced that anything environmental is some sort of elitist plot against “our God-given American way of life,” who just slurp up the mindless slander against “enviros” and “junk science,” and believe everything that the ExxonMobil-funded think tanks churn out. But for everyone else, it’s time to get serious about the problem. The CAFE (corporate average fuel economy) should be raised to at least 40 MPG in increments by 2010. A SERIOUS renewable energy program needs to be launched, not Bush’s cosmetic posturing and support for nuclear energy (unless he volunteers to store the nuclear waste at his Crawford, Texas ranch). This program should focus on photovoltaic (PV) solar, wind power, biofuels, and a substantial commitment to hydrogen, but only as a follow-on to the immediate switch to hybrids and biofuels. Coal should be phased out as a source of electricity until carbon sequestration can be perfected. (Read the forthcoming BIG COAL by Jeff Goodell for what we’re up against.) Energy experts claim that if the largely depopulated Great Plains were turned into a huge wind farm, it could supply 100% of U.S. electricity needs. They also claim that if enough Western desert, or enough buildings, were covered with PV cells, even at current efficiency, 100% of U.S. electricity needs could be met. So don’t believe the representatives of Peabody Coal, ExxonMobil or other industry representatives when they say that renewable energy can only supply some small portion of our energy needs. Of course Amory Lovins has been working since the oil crisis of the 1970s to improve energy efficiency (he calls the U.S. the “Saudi Arabia of energy inefficiency”), and there is vast potential for profitable improvements which will reduce demand (see his WINNING THE OIL ENDGAME).

_______________________________________________________________________

Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq by Thomas E. Weeks

Fiasco is a more strongly worded title than you might expect a seasoned military reporter such as Thomas E. Ricks to use, accustomed as he is to the even-handed style of daily newspaper journalism. But Ricks, the Pentagon correspondent for the Washington Post and the author of the acclaimed account of Marine Corps boot camp, Making the Corps, has written a thorough and devastating history of the war in Iraq from the planning stages through the continued insurgency in early 2006, and he does not shy away from naming those he finds responsible. His tragic story is divided in two. The first part–the runup to the war and the invasion in 2003–is familiar from books like Cobra II and Plan of Attack, although Ricks uses his many military sources to portray an officer class that was far more skeptical of the war beforehand than generally reported. But the heart of his book is the second half, beginning in August 2003, when, as he writes, the war really began, with the bombing of the Jordanian embassy and the emergence of the insurgency. His strongest critique is that the U.S. military failed to anticipate–and then failed to recognize–the insurgency, and tried to fight it with conventional methods that only fanned its flames. What makes his portrait particularly damning are the dozens of military sources–most of them on record–who join in his critique, and the thousands of pages of internal documents he uses to make his case for a war poorly planned and bravely but blindly fought. –Tom Nissle

________________________________________________________________

Planet of Slums by Mike Davis

From Publishers Weekly
Urban theorist Davis takes a global approach to documenting the astonishing depth of squalid poverty that dominates the lives of the planet’s increasingly urban population, detailing poor urban communities from Cape Town and Caracas to Casablanca and Khartoum. Davis argues health, justice and social issues associated with gargantuan slums (the largest, in Mexico City, has an estimated population of 4 million) get overlooked in world politics: “The demonizing rhetorics of the various international ‘wars’ on terrorism, drugs, and crime are so much semantic apartheid: they construct epistemological walls around gecekondus, favelas, and chawls that disable any honest debate about the daily violence of economic exclusion.” Though Davis focuses on individual communities, he presents statistics showing the skyrocketing population and number of “megaslums” (informally, “stinking mountains of shit” or, formally, “when shanty-towns and squatter communities merge in continuous belts of informal housing and poverty, usually on the urban periphery”) since the 1960s. Layered over the hard numbers are a fascinating grid of specific area studies and sub-topics ranging from how the Olympics has spurred the forceful relocation of thousands (and, sometimes, hundreds of thousands) of the urban poor, to the conversion of formerly second world countries to third world status. Davis paints a bleak picture of the upward trend in urbanization and maintains a stark outlook for slum-dwellers’ futures.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.